
Understand why CIPA lawsuits are rising and how to minimize privacy risk on your website.
Thank you!
Please check your email to view the guide.

LLMs and AI have gone from being a topic of discussion to becoming deeply integrated into every product. Privacy leaders must act quickly to develop and implement governance frameworks that help them deal with the complex privacy, security, and ethical considerations of this new reality.
At Bridge Privacy Summit 2025, Nishant Bhajaria moderated a discussion with AI governance leaders on how they solved AI governance challenges in their organizations and what best practices they learned in the process. Panelists included:
AI governance is a set of policies and practices that guide the development and use to ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. AI governance is more than a best practice or a compliance requirement; it’s a cross-functional effort that impacts data security, risk, product development, and corporate strategy. The panelists emphasized that AI governance needs to be treated as a broader organizational program rather than an isolated legal or compliance function.
Shoshana Rosenberg highlighted how AI governance affects data security, employee upskilling, client trust, and competitive positioning:
“The impact of AI on an organization requires monitoring and governance that far exceed the bar for legal compliance.”
“It has an impact on where your data is going... on where your employees are going... whether or not you're keeping up and giving them not just minimum literacy, but AI also offers the opportunity to upskill.”
Barbara Sondag emphasized the need for a structured governance framework with clear ownership:
“AI governance isn’t a standalone function, and it’s not just about risk mitigation. It’s an end-to-end process. From the data that goes into models to how outputs are used and who is responsible when things go wrong.”
“There’s got to be a framework and a governing body whether it’s a committee, an internal task force, or something else to ensure consistent decision-making across the company.”
Henri Kujala described AI governance as a cultural shift that needs to be ingrained into everyday workflows rather than treated as an afterthought:
“AI governance is a transformational program. It’s not a one-time fix. It has to be embedded into company culture.”
“We have to make responsible AI something that teams own themselves, rather than something imposed from the outside.”
Jon Adams warned that without strong leadership, different teams may interpret AI governance differently, creating inconsistency and confusion:
“If there’s no clear owner, you end up with different teams interpreting AI governance in different ways.”
“That leads to inconsistent policies, missed risks, and internal confusion. So whatever model you use, make sure there’s a leadership structure that keeps everyone aligned.”
With AI evolving faster than regulations, companies must balance governance with the need to remain competitive. The panel discussed the challenge of starting AI governance from scratch versus adapting it within an existing organization.
Jon Adams compared AI governance to building a plane mid-flight:
“We are building the plane while we’re flying it. The AI landscape is constantly evolving, and companies must adapt in real-time.”
“What worked six months ago is already outdated.”
Shoshana Rosenberg stressed the importance of embedding AI governance into every stage of product development:
“Governance should not be a layer you add later; it needs to be part of the product development lifecycle.”
Barbara Sondag explained why rigid frameworks fail:
“If your AI governance policies are static, you’ll be rebuilding them every time a new regulation comes out.”
“The best governance models are adaptable by design.”
With AI embedded in every business function, manual audits and risk assessments are no longer scalable. The panelists highlighted how AI tools can automate governance.
Henri Kujala pointed out that AI can help govern AI:
“There are so many AI innovations out there that can also lend their hand into AI governance context as well.”
Jon Adams, emphasized AI’s role in automating governance:
“A lot of AI governance is about documentation, about process. AI can automate those efforts to track data usage and ensure compliance without slowing teams down.”
With AI regulations constantly shifting, businesses must design governance frameworks that evolve alongside legal changes.
Shoshana Rosenberg explained why AI governance is not a one-time implementation:
“Your KPIs for an AI governance program should be such that if it was not adapted over the course of a year, you did something wrong.”
Barbara Sondag shared how her company, despite being over 40 years old, successfully integrated AI governance:
“For a company that’s 40+ years old, integrating AI governance wasn’t easy. But by making it a top priority at the leadership level, we ensured compliance keeps up without slowing the business down.”
The panel concluded that AI governance should not be a one-off compliance task but a continuous practice embedded into daily operations.
The panelists agreed that the most successful companies treat AI governance as a core business function rather than a regulatory obligation.
Our major takeaway for you?
AI governance is an ongoing process that leaders must prioritize, automate, and integrate across teams for efficient growth and innovation.
Watch on YouTube or listen to it on The Privacy Corner podcast.